From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SDjpj-0006JM-Qv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:58:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B680E0A9D; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge1.cs.stonybrook.edu (edge1.cs.stonybrook.edu [130.245.9.210]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD9AE08AC for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu (130.245.9.206) by edge1.cs.stonybrook.edu (130.245.9.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:57:12 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (72.89.250.133) by hubcas1.cs.stonybrook.edu (130.245.9.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:57:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4F762BCF.9010204@cs.stonybrook.edu> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:55:27 -0400 From: Richard Yao User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120301 Thunderbird/10.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CC: Joshua Kinard Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Happy 10th birthday (in advance) References: <20120330150041.c3f7684c.axel@james-b.ch> <4F75B45F.2050108@gentoo.org> <4F76226B.1020507@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4F76226B.1020507@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig14B911449221FEA2454B870D" X-Originating-IP: [72.89.250.133] X-Archives-Salt: 0f3c09e3-3435-44ea-b58f-5c0354897776 X-Archives-Hash: 4558de16d09ae34be41f4dc98e9733c4 --------------enig14B911449221FEA2454B870D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/30/12 17:15, Joshua Kinard wrote: > Maybe it's time for Gentoo-2.0? I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I think claiming 2.0 would be merited, if only for the attention it would draw at Phoronix. --------------enig14B911449221FEA2454B870D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPdivUAAoJELFAT5FmjZuEMr8QAKyBqmw3bqzky73Xcsr7jcIL R7ecw7NxK119k7vNxKSJ+lsiAvQ3w0jWvXnjXSgHTQpNw0EvzmDz1s2eFiKUQ0hb HgIukhmk4jJC7vy43dFSSTfzL0fWuwX0YKdDFj3WMsJfvbv03pECfcYuGMx+JLE5 INyPKEnMtuL6Zj1Oo/b2qu+2KmXiNjYxv+5NwI+sz0hqJ997YJBvqJsvaUR72Wxz mC5ZOfjsbUaq24z7LNMk970dbugUSShNmBq3Oy3PgQtQDkkvh486/kA1ChHnlJRU BN2P367LJwZfkZcvWbhjVFxO5OokBKUskjuuvH4QNKI3qOUApxG2Ilw2Oyj3KLjW c6UvvU8Xg4gR/AsMxXbKLYwTF8BdA0VvEYbactDqMvjvVab1QVQgXuekbnE9sbFM 0atKmNnAqiuHWkae7LOQ7yAzWWcQtm64OR3cHCFBk2UAVwb5+a52xTEWU+2J0Hpf GIoLrLV1D3h9aB1PvX/rRpxF/KivmQxslnQaEkaQglZD014+co61B/rOfuhmHOD4 BehI3Rl5ACwdkR33ZzJR4FuZQWqITATZIi43PaxVbIB87lelPPY/AODsf3clVWaf 1zpL6xUgMCg/zDSE+8aFIniesTf0AVYUIBQFOFsAXQKNRkm74VmRLmvaXdZihFot 1Mw5jZQVeYhVF/cQHDOL =zvq7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig14B911449221FEA2454B870D--