From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SDWrp-00070B-GI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:07:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 560C9E0C8A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A24E0C6B for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [85.77.51.195] (GYYYKMMDCCCXCV.gprs.sl-laajakaista.fi [85.77.51.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BE991B4005; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F75695C.1000704@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:05:48 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120328 Thunderbird/11.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QW1hZGV1c3ogxbtvxYJub3dza2k=?= CC: gentoo-dev Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup References: <20120322134818.GN2372@ctf.aoz.ath.cx> <1332426045.27053.7.camel@rook> <4F743239.9010103@gentoo.org> <4F74A2F5.5010603@gentoo.org> <1333094137-sup-4919@raeviah> In-Reply-To: <1333094137-sup-4919@raeviah> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 11e87fc6-249f-4ba0-931c-16d95e9b84a1 X-Archives-Hash: a67dbae99d4c51e44bc3fc5840191052 On 03/30/2012 10:56 AM, Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski wrote: > Excerpts from Samuli Suominen's message of 2012-03-29 19:59:17 +0200: >> I've been told dracut is able to handle this. Unverified. > > Dracut doesn't need anything built static. Thanks for verifying. Expected nothing less. I've reopened the bug[1]=20 for genkernel so it doesn't get lost... [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/409277