From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S9WPg-0006fW-M7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:49:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF99FE0938; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87522E0A70 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.66.90.24] (GGYYKMMMDCXXIV.gprs.sl-laajakaista.fi [193.66.90.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A27E41B402D for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F66D6B7.7080005@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:48:23 +0200 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120316 Thunderbird/11.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo CJK team empty, or anyone knows about ibus? References: <4F54C5F8.1050802@gentoo.org> <4F54D7D1.5070201@bonyari.com> <1332090541.21995.3.camel@belkin4> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ca1616d6-6709-4b62-94d3-898f99802b75 X-Archives-Hash: fab5a326b928cc6bf277269ecaa34c9c On 03/19/2012 04:34 AM, Ben wrote: > On 19 March 2012 01:09, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> >> Will CC cjk team then to let them know you are interested to join (looks >> like there are four devs in cjk alias...) > > But none of them seem active... > well I got answer (albeit too late) from 2 cjk developers but none of them really helped so after ibus-1.4.x went stable for dbus-1.4.18+/etc/machine-id compability users started flooding bugzilla with 'package xyz is not compatible with ibus-1.4.x' and I ended up picking up some of the pieces (some are still falling) it meant good bunch of cjk@ packages got reverted back to ~arch only, a trend I'm not seeing a end for :-/ - Samuli