From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S8Hak-0005oG-Dr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:48:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 373B5E0B23; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge1.cs.stonybrook.edu (edge1.cs.stonybrook.edu [130.245.9.210]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B93E0A92 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu (130.245.9.206) by edge1.cs.stonybrook.edu (130.245.9.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:47:14 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (72.89.250.133) by hubcas1.cs.stonybrook.edu (130.245.9.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:47:16 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6254E6.1080609@cs.stonybrook.edu> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:45:26 -0400 From: Richard Yao User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120301 Thunderbird/10.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CC: Joshua Kinard Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! References: <20120314150827.53dc8336@googlemail.com> <20120314152209.GA2157@kroah.com> <4F60D585.4050206@gentoo.org> <4F60E9C1.7050600@gentoo.org> <20120314210456.GB11179@kroah.com> <4F611E09.1040602@cs.stonybrook.edu> <20120314224916.GA12279@kroah.com> <4F61294B.9040101@cs.stonybrook.edu> <4F61E1EA.3040705@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4F61E1EA.3040705@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig50614EAF8D85780C71BBDF79" X-Originating-IP: [72.89.250.133] X-Archives-Salt: 7f88a20f-de9e-4b92-bf2b-d061d09e76ef X-Archives-Hash: 8a2a3b87923b29ea60a30d7d5f8c358d --------------enig50614EAF8D85780C71BBDF79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/15/12 08:34, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 03/14/2012 19:27, Richard Yao wrote: >=20 >> On 03/14/12 18:49, Greg KH wrote: >>>> 2. Why not make rootfs a NFS mount with a unionfs at the SAN/NAS dev= ice? >>> >>> unionfs is still a "work in progress", some systems can't do that yet= =2E >> >> That sounds like something that needs to be fixed. >=20 >=20 > I thought UnionFS died? Or was better handled by other "tricks" involv= ing > filesystem overlays? I know the UnionFS developer offline. I will ask him what the status of unionFS is the next time I see him. :) --------------enig50614EAF8D85780C71BBDF79 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPYlTmAAoJELFAT5FmjZuEtd4QALlVqK4WR4QZRoQquidxfkUG a/goF/CYTr3/vImyt/ZvUw8+k/mBIT9BRqIu4EANmzLkJIZo/nEGeTdNr8G7GEum 91JJea9DkoPeH3udeO7C6kwIZE6Jbk+UHINGNEPJGbS0so57UGVVZ9LhwerIWbIG E/RgyyMXEViiBgEw9teym+KBodw07lUJ6n7uuqsaUDCktfDg5TOWQN/MuI7b1Yie jySh4MKG59/6ZK8kQV4Uo5OMuB51K8AYJrSbhuKlI1bQO1ppqj+/d6FrHzSWhaap m+siuCx/LYq/9CmzzzQBveqET9qbXRLkajPP514m12P9g2VC2/VhIQjAMGQ8/MDD WW3KxDOakHrfJsUel8CTYJovy8JqzMEvNu+ZsY0GhowUF0136gdNTEhWhhoxYVlH v4LF28CUvJpEkilJfVETPiIcSa8Jt35+JprlpxNONsIWzg2OsxpLxwqQwEpFh/Pd xZrKAZXkInBpf5QXTImILg7+cPo1xFu9EUG2yAttPa6pE4xgaSw/wcSf3o/UruOA pREX1ZYQqgqBJ+j7M03iUxaCmMN696WcVx7kChi+FxT7q4eeNnRmOZUsy2ZxHjOf sWKBe3Ejp8Qu+xfiURUee0Kg1mRBy0qRniZ2xlx0mEa9caqx1koGNu8aJDwTBLCv MWUO5qIW2l543wEc6G7i =Gpii -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig50614EAF8D85780C71BBDF79--