From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S7zA5-0007Di-8p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:07:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBE4CE0B33; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72049E0AF2 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EACA32AC01A for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F614081.1010608@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:06:09 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120304 Thunderbird/10.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! References: <20120314150827.53dc8336@googlemail.com> <20120314152209.GA2157@kroah.com> <4F60D585.4050206@gentoo.org> <4F60E9C1.7050600@gentoo.org> <20120314210456.GB11179@kroah.com> <20120314225117.GB12279@kroah.com> <4F612E09.1090900@gentoo.org> <4F613EBA.2000103@cs.stonybrook.edu> In-Reply-To: <4F613EBA.2000103@cs.stonybrook.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1153c701-bd56-4a3d-bc81-f0ffc1464b34 X-Archives-Hash: ae1c3ab0404e7ea5b2c6821be78262e3 On 03/14/2012 05:58 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/14/12 20:36, David Leverton wrote: >> On 14 March 2012 23:47, Zac Medico wrote: >>> It's more about what we're _not_ doing that what we're doing. >> >> Clearly something must have changed in udev 181 to make >> /usr-without-initramfs not work anymore, and someone must have done >> something to make that change happen, unless udev has aquired the >> ability to evolve by itself. >> > > I suggest that you file a bug report regarding this for the Gentoo udev > maintainer. RESOLVED:UPSTREAM -- Thanks, Zac