From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S7Aga-0006QG-2T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:13:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6643DE0DAC; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD44E0DA0 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.124.242.207] (193-64-23-232-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [193.64.23.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 735E71B400A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F5E4978.1080800@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:07:36 +0200 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120303 Thunderbird/10.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: lilypond and reverse dependencies References: <4F5E245C.2040003@gentoo.org> <4F5E397E.7010803@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4F5E397E.7010803@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 371d3811-7e0b-4534-9ab3-8976c09152a0 X-Archives-Hash: 58a71a435f0343a2dcafac68a9144cc6 On 03/12/2012 07:59 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: > El 12/03/12 17:29, Samuli Suominen escribi=F3: >> # Samuli Suominen (12 Mar 2012) >> # media-sound/lilypond required for this is masked in ../package.mask >> # for removal >> app-text/asciidoc test >> > asciidoc only depends with the test use flag set so why don't just > remove the test USE and the test function from the ebuilds instead? > If somebody is willing to proxy the changes for me I can patch the tree > with this fix. > I know. If you look more closely, this is from package.use.mask, not package.mask= .