From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S78y7-0004Fy-AX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:23:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54B58E0C4E; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F77E0BBA for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13E5E1B4016 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F5E30F1.2010500@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:22:57 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120304 Thunderbird/10.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash References: <20120312155927.2cca0d3b@googlemail.com> <20318.11498.463319.52140@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120312171228.48c5b023@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120312171228.48c5b023@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a6887c7b-1f75-428f-8cfe-60887235bd7d X-Archives-Hash: 1218d00cc6c1b9856f6ccfc5f45a1965 On 03/12/2012 10:12 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:05:46 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> See above, even if we should ever move away from bash, GLEP 55 is >> still not needed. > > ...but we might as well go with GLEP 55 anyway, since GLEP 55 > definitely works, whereas other solutions might work so long as we > don't do something unexpected. > > This whole thing is just an exercise in trying to find excuses not to > use GLEP 55. If we do go with a variant of GLEP 55, I'd prefer a variant that uses a constant extension (like .eb) and places the EAPI string just after the version component of the name. For example: foo-1.0-r1-eapi5.ebuild -- Thanks, Zac