From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S6mkz-0000Du-V2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:40:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07E2CE0914; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE15E08E8 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.124.242.207] (193-64-23-232-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [193.64.23.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E31401B400B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F5CE268.4030408@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:35:36 +0200 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120303 Thunderbird/10.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181 References: <20120311022706.GA26296@linux1> <4F5C1BE9.3040609@gentoo.org> <20120311173355.GB6599@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20120311173355.GB6599@linux1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d1e250a9-7561-4b1e-b3bf-bb5220c238f1 X-Archives-Hash: b636c8c86361c7044c961d2073c2eece On 03/11/2012 07:33 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 07:28:41PM -0800, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 3/10/12 6:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> neither the genkernel nor dracut docs have specific instructions about >> >> I guess we could pour more effort in getting dracut more easy to use >> and/or try to figure out which are the items that should be moved to / >> and fix the remaining ones... > > I highly discourage moving more things to /. If you google for things > like, "case for usr merge", "understanding bin split", etc, you will > find much information that is very enlightening about the /usr merge and > the reasons for the /bin, /lib, /sbin -> /usr/* split. Indeed. I thought we got past this already and started moving things to /usr [1][2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/398081 http://bugs.gentoo.org/403073 More to follow...