From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S6kVH-0008AK-76 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:16:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F08CE087C; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595B3E0877 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (hnvr-4dbd5126.pool.mediaWays.net [77.189.81.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chithanh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5912364776 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F5CC159.1020602@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:14:33 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2jDrS1UaGFuaCBDaHJpc3RvcGhlciBOZ3V54buFbg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120309 Firefox/10.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.7.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecate EAPI1? References: <1331467306.11661.2.camel@belkin4> <4F5CA874.6070209@gentoo.org> <20120311135503.707de3b6@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120311135503.707de3b6@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 346071bc-e991-4d94-9717-019e7b640b77 X-Archives-Hash: 2cb94fcf00cc0745eba50d0948a78f10 Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: >> Is there really much of a benefit to this? I guess for anybody who >> runs scripts to mass-manipulate ebuilds it might be helpful, but I >> think all the package managers planned on supporting all the EAPIs for >> quite a while longer. > We have to support them indefinitely. It's not possible to uninstall a > package whose EAPI is unknown. > Would it be feasible to do a pkg_pretend() check and refuse install/upgrade if packages with unsupported EAPI are detected? Best regards, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n