From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S3kAn-00086j-6F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:18:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3C7DE0768; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8D8E0759 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62BF01B4025 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F51D3B8.1090201@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:18:00 -0800 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120219 Thunderbird/10.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-python] New eclass for Python References: <4F4D4380.9070909@gentoo.org> <201203030859.11412.Arfrever@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201203030859.11412.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: da917353-4578-4d88-ae3b-fb46ed6162e2 X-Archives-Hash: 5fd15753b84b06c6161cdfa1eb1f89dd On 03/02/2012 11:59 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2012-02-28 22:13:36 Krzysztof Pawlik napisa=C5=82(a): >> - uses PYTHON_TARGETS use-expand >=20 > You cannot painlessly use USE flags for this purpose in gentoo-x86 with= out support for use.unsatisfiable. Maybe we should change the repoman behavior so that it's just a warning when a USE-conditional dep is only satisfiable by a masked package. The probably makes more sense given that emerge --autounmask is enabled by default these days. --=20 Thanks, Zac