From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S2eJ9-00078V-Bg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:50:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B8C8E08EA; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC0CE0618 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (fi122.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.53.34.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A83CD1B401E for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F4DD892.10707@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:49:38 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass for Python References: <4F4D4380.9070909@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4F4D4380.9070909@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2CEFDBFF92F30073AF105330" X-Archives-Salt: 1df12bda-9678-4730-b611-da67d8cbdcde X-Archives-Hash: af98575ee2fdf3e47a66d39d5ae85617 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2CEFDBFF92F30073AF105330 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/28/12 10:13 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote: > Highlights: > - <400 lines of code including documentation > - should work for >95% of packages (my educated guess) > - did I mention it's *SIMPLE*? > - easy to maintain & read so it's also easy to use This is awesome! Compare that to over 3000 LOC of python.eclass. :) > Important thing: I'm not aiming at having 100% functionality of current= > python.eclass+distutils.eclass in the new one, I think that simplicity = is more > important that supporting every possible, obscure case that's out there= =2E Exactly. > If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will = add this > to portage (after finishing remaining TODO items, PyPy requires 4G of R= AM(!!)). I second this so much (didn't review the eclass in detail, but it's obviously better than python.eclass). What's the plan to retire python.eclass? --------------enig2CEFDBFF92F30073AF105330 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk9N2JkACgkQuUQtlDBCeQIjZwCghLApfPpdNSMlts28gGx2R6dh P/wAnievteTdIYt1XxylQa+KelWE7jMX =BTsI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2CEFDBFF92F30073AF105330--