* [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?
@ 2012-02-01 6:01 Sebastian Pipping
2012-02-01 8:16 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Pipping @ 2012-02-01 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Anthoine Bourgeois
Hello!
Anthoine and I are working on some new ebuilds related to a 3D mouse at
the moment. For two of these I wonder what package category makes a
good fit. While I would save your time on such a simple thing, I would
like to avoid moving around things later, too. I have inspected the
related metadata.xml files already.
Which categories do you advise for?
spacenavd
driver daemon (with optional X support)
--> sys-apps/spacenavd ?
--> app-misc/spacenavd ?
--> .. ?
libspnav
library accessing before-mentioned daemon
--> dev-libs/libspnav ?
--> media-libs/libspnav ?
--> sys-libs/libspnav ?
--> .. ?
spnavcfg
X11/GTK GUI tool for configuration
--> x11-misc/spnavcfg seems right
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?
2012-02-01 6:01 [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Sebastian Pipping
@ 2012-02-01 8:16 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-02-01 8:42 ` ScytheMan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Rostovtsev @ 2012-02-01 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 07:01 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> spacenavd
> driver daemon (with optional X support)
> --> sys-apps/spacenavd ?
> --> app-misc/spacenavd ?
> --> .. ?
I would suggest either sys-apps or x11-drivers.
> libspnav
> library accessing before-mentioned daemon
> --> dev-libs/libspnav ?
> --> media-libs/libspnav ?
> --> sys-libs/libspnav ?
> --> .. ?
dev-libs seems reasonable.
sys-libs definitely feels wrong, libspnav would look out of place in
that exclusive company of core system libraries.
-Alexandre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?
2012-02-01 8:16 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
@ 2012-02-01 8:42 ` ScytheMan
2012-02-01 18:26 ` Sebastian Pipping
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: ScytheMan @ 2012-02-01 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Take a look at g15daemon (useful for some logitech keyboards).
There you have:
app-misc/g15daemon
dev-libs/libg15
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?
2012-02-01 8:42 ` ScytheMan
@ 2012-02-01 18:26 ` Sebastian Pipping
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Pipping @ 2012-02-01 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 02/01/2012 09:42 AM, ScytheMan wrote:
> Take a look at g15daemon (useful for some logitech keyboards).
>
> There you have:
>
> app-misc/g15daemon
> dev-libs/libg15
>
Great, thanks!
Best,
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-01 18:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-01 6:01 [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Sebastian Pipping
2012-02-01 8:16 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-02-01 8:42 ` ScytheMan
2012-02-01 18:26 ` Sebastian Pipping
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox