From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RnMMs-0007gb-O9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:39:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29214E081F; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E91E07C0 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenr8 with SMTP id r8so128164yen.40 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:38:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gYUYQKzdUcLcTwZ6sJt1sC/A9geYj5AFR3rXq7Xr8Yc=; b=up4njhFYtWnAzo5DnlqdILuKb76GrVtL8Lq0eurU9BEqRSwBs522WqW7Ihg76FD5rL TSHuDu6HL7I8nVfa+Mug03mfhYZjV4d/PyGM3Aab67Lh2u+5c2ffoZppkGpwAzHsDp5G iv0OAsGJazS1m5zE+GVqU+IVAYWmzbqK7RBoU= Received: by 10.236.128.232 with SMTP id f68mr29112034yhi.17.1326857915122; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:38:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-147-47.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.147.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r1sm40352021yhh.14.2012.01.17.19.38.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:38:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F163EB2.8050700@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:38:26 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20120112 Firefox/9.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.6.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr References: <4F0440B3.4090500@gentoo.org> <20120106160719.GB18959@fury> <201201080047.27281.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> <20120108103345.382b8db3@pomiocik.lan> <20120110181452.GA14155@mailgate.onlinehome-server.info> <20120110194640.7696d2c7@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120110194640.7696d2c7@pomiocik.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 9ee6ecbf-ce3f-4a37-915f-7fd163dbf708 X-Archives-Hash: 4c682e934cde2af2466c0f498b131cdc Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:14:52 +0100 > Enrico Weigelt wrote: > >> * Micha?? G=C3=B3rny schrieb: >> >>> Does working hard involve compiling even more packages statically? >> I guess, he means keeping udev in / ? > Because adding 80 KiB of initramfs hurts so much? We should then put > more work just to ensure that admin doesn't have to waste 15 minutes to > recompile the kernel (if necessary), create an initramfs and add it to > bootloader config? > 80Kbs? You sure about that? I somehow failed to mention this before. =20 I noticed it when I saw another reply to this post. Reality check: root@fireball / # ls -al /boot/initramfs-3.* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5444240 Jan 1 07:24 /boot/initramfs-3.1.5-gentoo.= img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5515132 Jan 9 07:57 /boot/initramfs-3.2.0-r1.img root@fireball / # That's using the dracut tool. Somehow, over 50Mbs is not anywhere close=20 to 80Kbs, or maybe my calculator is broken. Dale :-) :-) --=20 I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or = how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=3D"--quiet-build=3Dn"