From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-49357-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Rl1lD-0005VY-Bo
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:14:51 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBEB721C0D4;
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:14:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B4F21C0C0
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:14:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yenm3 with SMTP id m3so506901yen.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:14:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=B6s2/aml5nuieH3LxbZjTr/nxFz5XLNOERauyTUyCII=;
b=VfPu4YJrmBmW8mtzsiEtO1m5T/jdIRdadap8+60J3e3wesvJf4aCVh2nWRDyOZwZOq
XTzkaK6hCFgSp5EQA4hoTcLrSx31oAajcHk2vbzaZgkJ7QGmV6yao0P9hbIGkWTI6TzD
qKS6PygwTo4DoVSgmYxw/Lfq9l0VySBQ8T0bc=
Received: by 10.236.193.70 with SMTP id j46mr32725824yhn.108.1326302045345;
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:14:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-65-42.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.65.42])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm5470890ant.12.2012.01.11.09.14.02
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F0DC357.6000202@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:13:59 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20120104 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr
References: <4F0440B3.4090500@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_nuCOpK=yrCN38hZMi7CZqYKZuqfmTdybjiOO51fqZ9cQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120106160719.GB18959@fury> <201201080047.27281.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> <20120108103345.382b8db3@pomiocik.lan> <20120110181452.GA14155@mailgate.onlinehome-server.info> <20120110194640.7696d2c7@pomiocik.lan> <4F0C89CB.6010402@gmail.com> <20120110200315.4f8dbb7a@pomiocik.lan> <4F0CBE41.7030502@gmail.com> <20120111084104.60ce07ee@pomiocik.lan> <4F0DBA1A.6010907@gmail.com> <20120111180107.0846d8d3@pomiocik.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20120111180107.0846d8d3@pomiocik.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 7d4a45f2-b45f-40d0-84c8-435260511135
X-Archives-Hash: 80f171fdcac92335d2ed966373e6c856
Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:34:34 -0600
> Dale<rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:40:01 -0600
>>> Dale<rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I keep hoping that all the smart people involved in this will see
>>>>>> the mess it is creating. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed
>>>>>> but I'm sharp enough to see the mess this is going to create and
>>>>>> I'm just a desktop user. I feel sorry for people with more
>>>>>> complicated systems or remote ones.
>>>>> The mess was created by people shouting 'hey, real men use
>>>>> separate /usr for no good reason! Be awesome like us'.
>>>>>
>>>> I think it is more like people do that when they have a good reason
>>>> to do so. I plan to put mine on /usr when I get the chance and
>>>> know that this init crap isn't going to break my rig. It's not
>>>> being "awesome" either.
>>> Remind me of a single good reason. Last time I heard those were
>>> mostly hacks and laziness.
>>>
>>
>> I already stated the reason. I'm going to put /usr on LVM. That is
>> not only a good reason, it is a GREAT reason.
> It is a hack.
>
How is putting /usr, /var, /home and such on LVM a hack? Your=20
definition of hack must have some really low standards. Does installing=20
Linux fall into your "hack" category to?
Dale
:-) :-)
--=20
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or =
how you interpreted my words!
Miss the compile output? Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=3D"--quiet-build=3Dn"