From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RbwAW-0005qP-5f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:27:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BA3A21C21C; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EC221C213 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (fi122.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.53.34.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 946281B4020 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EECB481.9050503@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:25:53 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date References: <4ECA0EA3.8020407@gentoo.org> <4EEB2087.2050608@gentoo.org> <4EEB4742.5000302@gentoo.org> <4EEB51B2.8060807@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4EEB51B2.8060807@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDAC64AEA04E7BC14C1DA53BC" X-Archives-Salt: e2d62dc3-4d44-43a5-bebd-f7017adc7205 X-Archives-Hash: ccad9c47c7b73e1a284459026c824107 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDAC64AEA04E7BC14C1DA53BC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/16/11 3:12 PM, justin wrote: > So lets agree that your proceeding is worth the effort, but extend the > time you give the maintainer to iron their packages. Sounds good, looks like other people have similar comments about this. I'll do that, thank you for feedback. :) --------------enigDAC64AEA04E7BC14C1DA53BC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk7stIMACgkQuUQtlDBCeQJ7hgCfdYFb8jsKDYQ1i1XlRN/D1slx 6yEAn02Af7tMt1RjHospqkKdZ/Q0e3RP =IuZ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDAC64AEA04E7BC14C1DA53BC--