From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:10:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEB2715.5060806@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1769026.9R6ACMvGeL@devil>
On 12/16/2011 06:06 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On Friday 16 December 2011 11:42:15 justin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add
>> arches after a "time out".
> Personally, I agree with have "more stable packages in tree", but I just point
> out one thing. If me, or another arch tester find ebuild issue(s) and
> maintainers does not care of it, makes no sense imho.
>
> I mark stable with a script and I'm uncomfortable to fix them. As Justin said,
> all maintainers are responsible of their packages, so I'd prefer to not touch
> other stuff.
>
> If you(for any developers) are busy and/or you can't fix them, feel free to
> mail me or just give an "ack" via irc and I'll provide to fix.
>
> Regards
> Agostino
Hi ago,
Does your script do any checking on the quality of the ebuild, eg that
it respects C/LDFLAGS. If so, that's useful and would help package
maintainers to better prepare their ebuilds for stabilization.
And congrats on making dev :)
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID : D0455535
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-16 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-21 8:41 [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-11-21 11:48 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-11-21 12:14 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2011-11-21 12:24 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-11-21 12:27 ` Rich Freeman
2011-11-21 13:12 ` James Broadhead
2011-11-21 15:47 ` Brian Dolbec
2011-11-23 14:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Torsten Veller
2011-11-24 15:17 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-11-24 16:35 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2011-11-24 17:12 ` Rich Freeman
2011-11-24 17:26 ` Pacho Ramos
2011-11-29 12:18 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-11-25 16:39 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Kahle
2011-11-25 19:06 ` Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
2011-11-29 12:17 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 10:42 ` justin
2011-12-16 11:06 ` Agostino Sarubbo
2011-12-16 11:10 ` Anthony G. Basile [this message]
2011-12-16 11:21 ` Agostino Sarubbo
2011-12-16 11:46 ` justin
2011-12-18 10:59 ` [gentoo-dev] checking C*FLAGS used for build (was: making the stable tree more up-to-date) Michał Górny
2011-12-16 11:07 ` [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date Brian Harring
2011-12-16 13:27 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 13:53 ` Rich Freeman
2011-12-16 14:05 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2011-12-16 18:40 ` Tim Harder
2011-12-16 14:12 ` justin
2011-12-17 15:25 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEB2715.5060806@gentoo.org \
--to=blueness@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox