From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RbVG5-0006DB-Er for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:43:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94AA921C062; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A5A21C04A for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ics6165.ics.kfa-juelich.de (ics6165.ics.kfa-juelich.de [134.94.118.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jlec) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE6DB1B409B; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EEB2087.2050608@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:42:15 +0100 From: justin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date References: <4ECA0EA3.8020407@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4ECA0EA3.8020407@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8A0F69D68FD24C9DA069A359" X-Archives-Salt: 44b460b0-69e0-46e6-bd3e-3901460b663f X-Archives-Hash: 0f793478c0c4157e53227c3a2d8d5e7d This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8A0F69D68FD24C9DA069A359 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add arches after a "time out". At least not after a such a short one. The maintainer is responsible for the package, that means it is their responsibility to decide that a package should go stable. In addition they have to make the package fit to the standards that the arch teams request. And I can tell from my own experience it is always more than the average package has. So as long as you don't review the packages yourself, consider a different proceeding than this timeout. Please remove all added arches from the packages maintained by all sci* teams. Thanks justin --------------enig8A0F69D68FD24C9DA069A359 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAk7rIIsACgkQgAnW8HDreRZ2bwCfQklgqhPv1Utbfujz357P8Uzm Cx8AoL/K0//TqxTJtsRki1KuNzz4ToB2 =EloV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8A0F69D68FD24C9DA069A359--