From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RVMYj-0004am-Go for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:13:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E55921C05A; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCE221C0C1 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (fi122.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.53.34.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 030981B401A for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4ED4CC03.4040501@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:11:47 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman not complaining when going straight to stable References: <4ED0AE49.9060903@gentoo.org> <20111126133000.0d487bb0@sf.home> In-Reply-To: <20111126133000.0d487bb0@sf.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD5E9EED1BE94C7DBE6C94C23" X-Archives-Salt: 05e2c5a3-db4b-48bd-abd8-ca40f3175461 X-Archives-Hash: f81da8a9e05b02e0ec438bd51c250d1a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD5E9EED1BE94C7DBE6C94C23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/26/11 11:29 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:15:53 +0100 > ""Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: >=20 >> This shouldn't be allowed, should it? The package is keyworded only >> ~x86, and I'm adding amd64 stable keyword, and repoman doesn't complai= n. >=20 > It would need to fetch latest CVS file from server to check against pre= vious state. > I don't think repoman does any network IO safe updating metadata.dtd. Why does it warn about going straight to stable for _new_ ebuilds? Is it because it knows locally that it's a new file, and because of that doesn't need to connect to network? That'd make sense. Would it be possible to add repoman checks (possibly behind a special flag) that could use "cvs diff" results? --------------enigD5E9EED1BE94C7DBE6C94C23 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk7UzA0ACgkQuUQtlDBCeQLGUwCdHoqqSZRaXny5icCLG39iyK9Y u58An3YQOjBvlZPNzM6+4Ib/afZslmkE =BWeo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD5E9EED1BE94C7DBE6C94C23--