I think that with recent advancements in batch-stabilization we're able to process a much higher amount of stabilization bugs, and keep the bug queue low. It used to be longer than 100 bugs, but now it's closer to 20-30 bugs for which regressions or other problems have been detected. This allows us to do better testing of the stabilization candidates, but also I think we should start bringing even more updates to the stable tree. When doing stable testing I frequently notice bugs fixed in ~arch but not stabilized, so stable is frequently affected by problems that could be easily fixed by stabilizing a more recent version. I wrote a script, , that scans the tree for packages that could be easily stabilized (all deps stable, no bugs). I'm attaching a list of packages that are sitting in the tree for at least 6 months (180 days, way more than 30 days required for stabilization) and should be ready for stabilization. Please review the list, it's 800+ packages so I thought about asking for feedback before filing stabilization bugs (I plan to do that in stages of course). Paweł