From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RPyN2-0001JV-Vm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:22:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EB5DE02CE; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0D421C0E1 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.4] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 462381B400B for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EC1322B.2020602@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:22:19 -0800 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111102 Thunderbird/7.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default References: <4EB4FA98.3080201@gentoo.org> <4EBD42EE.4060104@gentoo.org> <4EBEF208.5060500@gentoo.org> <201111121840.16686.vapier@gentoo.org> <4EBFBA75.3030500@gentoo.org> <1321188262-sup-4513@raeviah> <4EBFCD5D.3080807@gentoo.org> <1321194595-sup-8983@raeviah> <4EBFE727.8000903@gentoo.org> <4EC02CC0.9080907@gentoo.org> <4EC04E11.3060500@gentoo.org> <4EC0559C.4020806@gentoo.org> <4EC06E9D.4060803@gentoo.org> <4EC075F9.4070801@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ad32db5a-5f9c-4446-9220-2d193187dd4a X-Archives-Hash: 49626f04898306f8794ffc8c24bc477b On 11/14/2011 12:47 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:59, Zac Medico wrote: >> Well, it's much easier to gather interest and get feedback if we deploy >> the change and ask questions later. > > I like the new output, but find it kind of annoying that there's very > little feedback on how far the progress is within a single job. > Perhaps we could show the currently executing ebuild phase in order to > give a little more feedback? Maybe most packages are completely > dominated by src_compile(), but for smaller packages it would be > helpful, IMO. I think that would be an interesting option. I imagine that it would be too much information for many people, so I don't think that we'd want to enable it by default. -- Thanks, Zac