From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:37:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EADD18F.9050300@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EADD0CF.70601@gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 10/30/2011 10:33 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell,
>> is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason
>> for keeping these before i punt them ? -mike
>>
>
> Breaking overlays. Isn't the standing policy still to not break
> backwards compatibility as long as an eclass exists?
>
> Regards, Petteri
>
We have no have direct control on overlays. It is up to maintainers to
ensure that their packages work with portage eclasses or they can have
their own eclasses locally.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)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=IwIg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-30 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 23:40 [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? Mike Frysinger
2011-10-30 22:33 ` Petteri Räty
2011-10-30 22:37 ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2011-10-30 22:50 ` Samuli Suominen
2011-10-31 0:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-31 4:44 ` William Hubbs
2011-10-31 6:56 ` Patrick Lauer
2011-10-31 17:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2011-11-03 0:13 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EADD18F.9050300@gentoo.org \
--to=hwoarang@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox