From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ5oM-0005xT-7m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:54:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F03BE055E; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27C621C02C for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (fi122.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.53.34.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FDD21B4019 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EA81746.4090701@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:20:54 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] redundant code in toolchain.eclass? X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig880057D0D34C159556B1BA6F" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e3615354265884576e55e797df206936 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig880057D0D34C159556B1BA6F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was browsing toolchain.eclass and noticed this: if [[ ${PN} !=3D "kgcc64" && ${PN} !=3D gcc-* ]] ; then ... [[ -n ${SPECS_VER} ]] && IUSE+=3D" nossp" ... if tc_version_is_at_least 3 ; then ... if tc_version_is_at_least "4.4" ; then IUSE+=3D" graphite" [[ -n ${SPECS_VER} ]] && IUSE+=3D" nossp" fi ... fi fi The second IUSE+=3D" nossp" seems redundant and could be removed, right? --------------enig880057D0D34C159556B1BA6F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk6oF0oACgkQuUQtlDBCeQLAIwCfQjcTwm0Jp8IK03ZPp07HogII 60sAnRwLgSGJRQmy6+0cuCE+h3UqTCYo =MCye -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig880057D0D34C159556B1BA6F--