From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RFBLx-0003VA-6q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:01:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0417C21C112; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7C621C0D0 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (adsl-75-36-171-60.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [75.36.171.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CFF01B400A for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E99F461.1050203@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:00:17 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying References: <4E8766F1.2020609@gentoo.org> <20111014193958.GA3465@localhost> <4E98A793.8050806@gentoo.org> <4E98B88F.3010206@gentoo.org> <4E98BCD9.5060204@gentoo.org> <4E98DDA4.60002@gentoo.org> <4E98E7B8.7000102@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig78791E3D7C63F6EEF34D294F" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e98b31ac4e13f6344509768f94adef9f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig78791E3D7C63F6EEF34D294F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/15/11 2:42 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:54, Mike Gilbert wrote:= >> That would be an ok approach from my perspective: We could just change= >> line 14 of python.eclass and let package maintainers report breakage a= s >> they increment EAPI. I am confident that nothing EAPI <=3D 3 would bre= ak. >> >> Is anyone (especially djc and the python herd members) opposed to this= ? >=20 > Seems fine to me; I can't really think of a practical better way. Thank you, change committed to CVS then. Hopefully nobody will get upset about this. I'll wait a few days before I start using EAPI-4 in ebuilds using python.eclass, but I've done local tests and everything works fine (for the ebuild I (co-)maintain). --------------enig78791E3D7C63F6EEF34D294F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk6Z9GgACgkQuUQtlDBCeQK7BwCfcldMbrGbE7OzYBaE0hkEhtgb 8L4An0wyJcYzeJtERsltBK5rbmoaa0NA =q15c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig78791E3D7C63F6EEF34D294F--