From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1REPLz-0007A8-06 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:45:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88C4A21C0FA; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B9D21C033 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.168.169] (dyn-199-173-dsl.vsp.fi [83.146.199.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8F49641F7 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E9723A1.4080603@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:45:05 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111005 Thunderbird/7.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild References: <20111001170259.E4D702004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <4E96226D.8060807@gentoo.org> <4E9629A7.3080405@gentoo.org> <201110122019.02773.vapier@gentoo.org> <4E965A76.1040109@gentoo.org> <4E96FF2F.8090705@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E96FF2F.8090705@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: d445f5ac6739dd4776770dee4bd76260 On 10/13/2011 06:09 PM, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: > Samuli Suominen schrieb: >> you're right. sorry. that came out too harsh. lets rephrase this as: >=20 > No offense taken :) >=20 >> "This /topic should be in the end-quiz, and mentioned in the mentoring >> guide to cover basis as part of the KEYWORDS visibility handling." >=20 > This is something that I have been asking for all the time. If you thin= k > that what qutecom did should be illegal in Gentoo, then disallow it in > policy or code. Drop that "should be" act, please. It looks as if you were still suggesting it was fine to do what qutecom did... Merely saying if we had some documentation snippet, or an end-quiz question for this, QA could more easily/faster revoke access if someone were to do this intentionally in tree. This could be minor motivation for me to write such snippet, but it's definately not near top on my TODO= .