From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RAHHo-0007uX-0g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:20:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3B2D21C0A7; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FCA21C058 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.168.169] (dyn-199-173-dsl.vsp.fi [83.146.199.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FC6C1B4013 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:19:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E881EC1.5030008@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 11:20:17 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110926 Thunderbird/6.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild References: <20111001170259.E4D702004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <4E875C08.4050906@gentoo.org> <4E87A5E2.2030709@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E87A5E2.2030709@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 461fc9db4204fd5259e827345eee1ed2 On 10/02/2011 02:44 AM, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: > Samuli Suominen schrieb: >> On 10/01/2011 08:02 PM, Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen (chithanh) wrote: >>> chithanh 11/10/01 17:02:59 >>> >>> Added: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.= ebuild >>> Log: >>> Bring back qutecom. >> >> Bringing back version of qutecom, that is forcing downgrade on >> linux-headers, when >=3D 2.6.38 is being stabilized is completely >> unacceptable. >=20 > Please point to existing authoritative documentation which says that > downgrades are unacceptable. >=20 >> It is NOT gentoo-x86 compatible package in it's current form. >=20 > It sets correct dependency on an existing ebuild in tree. The dependenc= y > is only build time, users can upgrade linux-headers again afterwards. > The application itself is v4l2 compatible. common sense... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D311241#c2 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D311241#c5 linux-headers -> glibc. no package should force downgrade on linux-headers, risking glibc building against older version than KEYWORDS visibility would allow. > What I am a bit unhappy about is that the package was masked and remove= d > while I was away. Even bypassing the usual 30 days and no last rite > announcement was sent to -dev. http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_5e6d8403c90549d8caf4f27f0d14f01= f.xml > Bug 361181 is certainly on my TODO list, just not very high up to now. > If you think that there is some urgency in getting rid of the package, > please do explain so in advance. The time ran out with opening of http://bugs.gentoo.org/384733 for linux-headers reverse deps to be tracked stable. I've removed qutecom for you again. - Samuli