From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R80vO-0001cr-RP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:28:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1617F21C2C3; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1EF21C0CE for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.4] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 828E81B40FD for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E7FE2F9.7090300@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:27:05 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110827 Thunderbird/6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr References: <1740055.XA9oyAS8HQ@eve> <201109252132.56341.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 83b2d4a5f3cc293693916d18f3fdaf30 On 09/25/2011 06:57 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Sunday, September 25, 2011 05:53:18 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >>> "Gentoo" is defined by portage and the portage tree. If we remove >>> that, the end result is no different than compiling stuff manually in >>> Slackware or by hand. Sure, the average Chrome OS end user may not know the difference. However, it makes a difference to the Gentoo community to have our tools and tree used by Chrome OS developers, and have them contribute back fixes and enhancements. >> which is how Chrome OS is built. >> ROOT=/some/place emerge >> > > Yes, I'm well aware of how ChromeOS is built. :) > > But neither portage, nor the portage tree, nor any of our branding are > shipped with ChromeOS. Hence it's as much a Gentoo install as $company > that uses portage to build $image for their embedded device, but > doesn't leave any trace of Gentoo behind. So what? I work on Gentoo for the benefit of myself and others (including Chrome OS devs), not because I want people to see Gentoo branding, or have more people identify themselves as "Gentoo users." -- Thanks, Zac