From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R5nHa-0003bj-Cn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:29:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFA7321C165; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.64]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C7121C030 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id aas91h0011zF43QA7nV9hd; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:29:09 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([76.106.65.35]) by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ank71h00v0leNgC8knk807; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:44:08 +0000 Message-ID: <4E77D037.3090300@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:28:55 -0400 From: Joshua Kinard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants References: <201109151534.07155.vapier@gentoo.org> <20110915221200.4fc12739@pomiocik.lan> <201109151633.48737.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201109151633.48737.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6846180EDD8F8726A931D4E8" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b2cdd5cd0d702a0df00a9b2307b0d952 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6846180EDD8F8726A931D4E8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/15/2011 16:33, Mike Frysinger wrote: >=20 > the sizeof(long) and sizeof(void*) are the same between x86 and x32. h= owever,=20 > that's about the only thing. for example, x32 gets access to 64bit reg= isters=20 > when working with 64bit types (long long) and the tuple is x86_64-pc-li= nux- > gnu. in general, it seems to be closer to amd64 than x32. > -mike Virtually the exact same for MIPS n32 ABI. Needs a 64bit kernel, needs a= mips64-*-linux-gnu toolchain, but the output is a hybrid 32bit/64bit bina= ry. I wonder if procps ever resolved that PAGE_SIZE mess internally when we brought the o32/n32/n64 mess to light with its author? --=20 Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS kumba@gentoo.org 4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. A= nd our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-bet= ween." --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic --------------enig6846180EDD8F8726A931D4E8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOd9A3AAoJENsjoH7SXZXjvK8P/RTuEEupgQejaD4wrMungISj arldVCYHsRqARtbOu8F9P3ZtJUlZF92S2QHXn1EcXDvR6ydUKeQpwaclO9J6qFeU Mc9hM4G8zZKzhvumaApNBaebL9XofRdcCPeKp5K5daI608Dx4XdlN44ZbyBx81wQ +v4uk4wVfGYZSKxOwvoxH6CrmzAlFN4J4L5D+CnRBKkuxbK4rBcVeocmzJqU5NfM bSJr2zOdYnPXny3sLrdD6JnyI5RAqG6UCT3ncIkenkT7mna90OayImxAx4HozjUP 6EzMNg5Je8wkLqEF1F4vk11/glpqUDMcjJG9BwVb0vA4zBwdtc9gzLErv+c4480N /1Bf5k8nrIpn5DVQ7GLLHQds71NLQsrO1xuXoh7PDF6+H/+L5ShA6TrKoRSdnblv RifDHMcOyH1Hx49jFcxiOlICslAjxb807XALJ5Vt8xBGFeUdMKQ2NHn0UoYO5MhW r2O9a7Z7fP/dwXHnGAHNy83ADgAzpZ67oofuTKJCdoq06nWcPdb0fob03ZZuWpfH 9K0NUgMmMlsRUq1ihmvm6kT2iVf6zFu+TIsWKsikAJgX/J7dbPBmoPqFviVfkoPT SUig/sreFmTbv4+G+A/uwqh8i9sBOJpvo6hnrpipqUNxJXhLTjp5QgLhYKpg41GI 9gg2UknyhuVC9gfv8HPa =SM1Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6846180EDD8F8726A931D4E8--