From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R4doD-0004vm-BN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:10:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACF5121C18D; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747DE21C115 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.22] (p548D536D.dip.t-dialin.net [84.141.83.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tommy) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3AF11B4015 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E739F00.1010609@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:09:52 +0200 From: Thomas Sachau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110823 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants References: <201109151534.07155.vapier@gentoo.org> <4E7308A8.6020603@gentoo.org> <201109161208.41518.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201109161208.41518.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 OpenPGP: id=211CA2D4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB3CBE99C2DE3B2E7A36F6EB0" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 349158305c3e749ec3ebce9a2fd0f7a4 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB3CBE99C2DE3B2E7A36F6EB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Frysinger schrieb: > On Friday, September 16, 2011 04:28:24 Stratos Psomadakis wrote: >> Is a x86/amd64/x32 multilib profile just going to provide toolchain >> support for x32 binaries (like x86 in a x86/amd64 multilib profile), o= r >> do we want a 'full' x32 profile, where every package is built by defau= lt >> as x32 code? >=20 > this is an issue for the multilib-portage project > -mike How is this an issue for multilib-portage? It only requires a toolchain a= ble to build for the target and the details in environment (like possible targets and needed addition= al flags for each target). Thinking about the issues when starting with a new target, it might be a = good idea to have the basic system (stage3) for the multilib profile to contain files for all targets= , but only enable the default ABI. So when a user wants some other targets, he already has a ba= se system, else he can just reinstall the base system and drop the unused files with this step. --------------enigB3CBE99C2DE3B2E7A36F6EB0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAk5znwUACgkQG7kqcTWJkGcTigP9EmGliK9zJWyCx9h0aqYBjUX5 IkgVZiTlbPYKb7gIqkfvxGzrGtbsYlDaYGSO4wSSn23c4eEXKpoED/r43bB48u94 FLtFU/wMBIQBPozuUcpdgERvONiESRXQ9DImq7iUULn1PJQg1P4Blh2GKD3nwguf 7eEIdeC+ErOFC9tVghM= =C/04 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB3CBE99C2DE3B2E7A36F6EB0--