public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:25:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E739483.5080107@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109161332.01947.vapier@gentoo.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09/16/11 20:32, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:06:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 09/16/11 10:58, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2011 10:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:35:55 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>>>> PS why not merge all x86 abis into one keyword? because 
>>>>>> x86_32 x86_64 x86_x32 are only abis of x86. Also we dont
>>>>>> have different keywords for different mips abis (64bit
>>>>>> and 32bit ones)
>>>>> 
>>>>> that'd be nice :)
>>>> 
>>>> Seems even acceptable. Not sane but acceptable. People tend
>>>> to keyword packages both '~amd64 ~x86' testing them on amd64
>>>> only; amd64 users tend to get sad when someone keyworded a
>>>> package '~x86' only.
>>>> 
>>>> On the other hand, it'd be good to have ABI sub-keywords
>>>> then. Something like 'x86:x86 -*' if a package is actually
>>>> x86-only.
>>> 
>>> I guess there are only a few cases where a package should be 
>>> keyworded for eg x86, but not for amd64, so these few cases can
>>> be handled by p.masks, right?
>>> 
>>> So, we can have a single x86 keyword, and a single x86
>>> 'parent' profile, and subprofiles for x86(or x86_32), amd64,
>>> and x32.
>>> 
>>> I guess it's not that simple, but I think that's how the mips 
>>> profiles work?
>> 
>> I am a bit confused by your proposal. Do you suggest to drop
>> 'amd64' and use x86(parent)/amd64(subprofile)(for x86_64)
>> instead?
> 
> that would be ideal, and drop "amd64" in the process: x86/x86_64/ 
> -mike

Ok so we will probably have the following multilib options

* x86(ABI=x86_32{/lib}) + amd64(ABI=x86_64{lib64/}) +
x32(ABI=x32{/libx32})
* x86/amd64 ( what we already have in amd64 multilib )
* x86/x32

and

* x86 (no multilib for 32-bit processors ) ( what we already have in
x86 profile )

Sounds doable

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
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=wlRl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-16 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-15 19:34 [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants Mike Frysinger
2011-09-15 20:00 ` Alexey Shvetsov
2011-09-15 20:35   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-16  7:48     ` Michał Górny
2011-09-16  7:58       ` Stratos Psomadakis
2011-09-16  8:14         ` Michał Górny
2011-09-16 15:06         ` Markos Chandras
2011-09-16 17:32           ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-16 18:25             ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2011-09-17  5:53               ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-09-16 18:07           ` [gentoo-dev] " Stratos Psomadakis
2011-09-15 20:12 ` Michał Górny
2011-09-15 20:33   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-15 21:03     ` Michał Górny
2011-09-15 21:18       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-16  5:46         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-09-16 18:15           ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-19 23:28     ` [gentoo-dev] " Joshua Kinard
2011-09-16  8:28 ` Stratos Psomadakis
2011-09-16 16:08   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-16 19:09     ` Thomas Sachau
2011-09-16 20:17       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-16 13:36 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-16 14:06   ` Michał Górny
2011-09-16 16:01     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-16 16:24       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-16 15:52   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-20  0:25   ` Joshua Kinard
2011-12-02 20:54 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-02 21:25   ` Samuli Suominen
2011-12-02 21:55     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-06 21:40   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-06 22:13   ` Markos Chandras
2011-12-06 22:39     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-10  8:02       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-10 13:15         ` [gentoo-dev] " octoploid
2011-12-10 18:37           ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-10 19:36             ` Alec Warner
2011-12-10 19:49               ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-10 20:01               ` Mike Gilbert
2011-12-11  1:36                 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-12-11  3:18                   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-12 14:47                     ` Francesco Riosa
2011-12-12 17:26                       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-12 22:47                         ` Francesco Riosa
2011-12-13 21:20                           ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-08 21:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2011-12-08 21:29   ` Markos Chandras
2011-12-08 21:34     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-12-08 21:40       ` Markos Chandras
2011-12-08 22:11         ` Mike Frysinger
2012-06-05 18:44 ` [gentoo-dev] x32 release candidate Mike Frysinger
2012-06-06  2:17   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-06-06  5:14   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-06-06 19:40   ` Gregory M. Turner
2012-06-06 20:14     ` vivo75
2012-06-07  3:17     ` Mike Frysinger
2012-06-07  6:13       ` Luca Barbato
2012-06-07 13:38         ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E739483.5080107@gentoo.org \
    --to=hwoarang@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox