From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R4TLM-0000tt-Ta for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:00:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 784D221C1CA; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ulysses.noc.ntua.gr (ulysses.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.230]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB98921C063 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alexander.cc.ece.ntua.gr (alexander.cc.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.2.1]) by ulysses.noc.ntua.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8G7xXgA048407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:59:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from psomas@gentoo.org) Received: from DPGBB-GTSIGOU01.dpg.gr (inferno.cc.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.2.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by alexander.cc.ece.ntua.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3+etch1) with ESMTP id p8G7xUTF020731 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:59:30 +0300 Message-ID: <4E730189.2010207@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:58:01 +0300 From: Stratos Psomadakis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110906 Thunderbird/6.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants References: <201109151534.07155.vapier@gentoo.org> <28d0b6ed6e38725a08c800899a13145d@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> <201109151635.56368.vapier@gentoo.org> <20110916094819.081dc2c5@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110916094819.081dc2c5@pomiocik.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=6.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on alexander.cc.ece.ntua.gr X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ulysses.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.230]); Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:59:34 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at ulysses.noc.ntua.gr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4c7a2c8e7b6e3170ff824c072dd878d1 On 09/16/2011 10:48 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:35:55 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> PS why not merge all x86 abis into one keyword? because x86_32 >>> x86_64 x86_x32 are only abis of x86. Also we dont have different >>> keywords for different mips abis (64bit and 32bit ones) >> that'd be nice :) > Seems even acceptable. Not sane but acceptable. People tend to keyword > packages both '~amd64 ~x86' testing them on amd64 only; amd64 users > tend to get sad when someone keyworded a package '~x86' only. > > On the other hand, it'd be good to have ABI sub-keywords then. > Something like 'x86:x86 -*' if a package is actually x86-only. > I guess there are only a few cases where a package should be keyworded for eg x86, but not for amd64, so these few cases can be handled by p.masks, right? So, we can have a single x86 keyword, and a single x86 'parent' profile, and subprofiles for x86(or x86_32), amd64, and x32. I guess it's not that simple, but I think that's how the mips profiles wo= rk? --=20 Stratos Psomadakis