From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QOE6u-0008K9-NS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 19:14:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7FF41C082; Sun, 22 May 2011 19:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A98E1C049 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 19:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Nyx.local (dynamic-adsl-84-223-249-107.clienti.tiscali.it [84.223.249.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C1E71B4024 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 19:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DD96070.5030605@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 21:13:52 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory References: <20110517165748.GA3266@linux1> <4DD62D24.4030306@gentoo.org> <201105201254.28273.mpagano@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201105201254.28273.mpagano@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 082ceef68dcac72d53336c27d103019f On 5/20/11 6:54 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > On Friday 20 May 2011 04:58:12 Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 5/17/11 6:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> That shouldn't be read as endorsing the peculiar and conceptually broken >> init replacement called systemd. >> >> lu > > Just curious, would you mind elaborating on it's peculiarities and conceptual brokenness? Having sockets managed by init instead of your daemon doesn't work quite well. (see why xinetd isn't used in many real-life situations) lu