From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QKSJx-00081K-E9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:36:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30CEC1C0CB; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2781C0C6 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.199] (qiv7.kyla.fi [82.130.46.199]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 308F53EB9C for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DCBA9DB.6070102@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 12:35:23 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: *_iface variables in openrc network scripts References: <20110512014540.GA28033@linux1> <20110512015528.GA29093@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20110512015528.GA29093@linux1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC69589FE5D30D3B139D27AD2" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c509bbda72527e45d5fb31025abca6a9 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC69589FE5D30D3B139D27AD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/12/2011 04:55 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > Yeah I know I'm replying to my own message, but I also have another ide= a > about this. Another option would be that for the next release we just > stop parsing and use config_* but without trying to do any conversions.= >=20 > The disadvantage of this would be that people would have to change thei= r > /etc/conf.d/net files immediately after they upgrade or their network > might not come up. >=20 > It is true that this would be easier from a coding perspective, but > would it be ok for the users? >=20 The ebuild could try to detect mismatch in syntax and then emerge --config could provide migration. I don't think users will mind as long as they are able to avoid unreachable systems :) Regards, Petteri --------------enigC69589FE5D30D3B139D27AD2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNy6neAAoJEPeUsk245OzwGQoQAJ8aWKAtOf22dsulJmVEXB/F yVyvONwPMAw/RsiUfr7NrDFYEr37yNdwA627jI5bWmiWuMB24x7/7jlmbyMCozaL TYRsWiEg1+nDyr1SzofZhd0GLjJ7sSgF9LE9TymHrES5NASmNxU7GZPqrAelpbK/ GGkj7hh670qWv1kZodcXTfJZTFvmg6iZ8J+5kXD+j78YJ/oqBxUdXsFZgfQ0w9Hj S9ET+qn0LcJpFS226MvDPWXw7xNCKDVrTdrudWt13Ftux2oAWb/DKulXb13yiFVb N68pilvrOkWYDhe4+c0D3+s3A9bxAEeC5IVf8cKlM1P10POKBsHLonEapT8S52ev /PFX6IJgN5+jeqQywN39FDuS/9ni3k6nkqPcMRlP4XdA57rFaZzthQCHT5MQ1B2o ZHI62t8K6Q9QK6EZMG25so0QgK/mFpPHenhq7q+ShL8lQvH08y3/AF0q1g86eTPP NwRuRC/z96XzhlGKyNxkRF1I75zWcfUaFyaShKqZmumC2A/iatDOTFZB0CNkZyHq xdthOd2MmFKAU4GXD4/NGDFrxwKe+607e0mn5mbqveoxGnC6vymCUZtIZAvGOl5v eszSQA685HZPb/7ovxBYINkTBZCIOZSoq4ZDXGqaIsv+YmyFaxWxy+pgFNBxzRzF tzYgZgk1l12vZO2Q9S+A =iQYh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC69589FE5D30D3B139D27AD2--