From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QJgKJ-000571-Hr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 06:21:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06A131C00A; Tue, 10 May 2011 06:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1621C008 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 06:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (fi122.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.53.34.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 893B31B4048 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 06:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DC8D8EF.9040602@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 08:19:27 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits References: <20110510020849.GA5109@altair> In-Reply-To: <20110510020849.GA5109@altair> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1278C8EB0B526EEBB98D3824" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 43a1864761c75991831dd4f2f19c46a3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1278C8EB0B526EEBB98D3824 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/10/11 4:08 AM, Jim Ramsay wrote: > - Does this tree signing key have to be DSA? Or is RSA okay too? No idea, I'd probably just try and see if signing works. > - If I have a key already, should I generate a new subkey just > for manifest signing, make a whole new primary key, or just use > the same key I use to sign my emails? See , I think no separate key should be needed. --------------enig1278C8EB0B526EEBB98D3824 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk3I2PMACgkQuUQtlDBCeQIuRwCfbsDDs398Dv9eqzbn3yrMM22k slUAn2WUtTgKLNu5N0pYYDFntLpwE4oh =MCqG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1278C8EB0B526EEBB98D3824--