From: Marijn <hkBst@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] introspection use flag
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 15:18:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC3F51C.5070406@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304684738.4741.4.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/11 14:25, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le vendredi 06 mai 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Marijn a écrit :
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I was just looking into the meaning of the introspection use-flag and
>> there are many ebuilds that use it so perhaps it should be globalized,
>> which would also give us a chance to improve the naming/description.
>> Current descriptions are:
>>
>> Use dev-libs/gobject-introspection for introspection
>> Enable GObject introspection.
>>
>> Currently it is hard to tell which functionality is enabled through this
>> flag and the meaning of the descriptions for when the flag is off are
>> even more unclear. Does it mean that introspection will not be used or
>> will some other way of introspection be used? Either way, perhaps the
>> people in the know could shed some light on this issue?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Marijn
>
> See original thread on this mailing list:
>
> From: Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@gentoo.org>
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: introspection
> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:12:58 +0530 (20/06/2010 16:42:58)
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTimjJIGW6k5vQCX-wryeYy_FPUTQpRN7jmW4xRKN@mail.gmail.com>
>
Thanks for the pointer![1] Having just read that discussion it seems
that even back then many developers found that the name "introspection"
is too broad/imprecise. Several alternatives were proposed, like
gintrospection, gobject-introspection, gir, api-introspection. I think
any of these would have been better than the current name.
And what happened to the proposed description:
introspection: Add gobject-introspection support, allowing for the
dynamic generation of bindings for various languages
which at least contains a hint of what the purpose is of this flag? But
maybe someone can do even better than that now that this technology has
been in use for a while?
Marijn
[1]:http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=127704501818312&w=2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk3D9RwACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wFYwCffN8xniGaK1ExXCsi90hPX3pJ
SlkAn3yScPxj88ttiycYABe36ZVaJ46g
=kd6G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-06 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 8:40 [gentoo-dev] introspection use flag Marijn
2011-05-06 12:25 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2011-05-06 13:18 ` Marijn [this message]
2011-05-06 13:30 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2011-05-06 18:04 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2011-05-06 23:18 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-05-08 20:48 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2011-05-08 21:01 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-05-08 21:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-05-06 12:55 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DC3F51C.5070406@gentoo.org \
--to=hkbst@gentoo.org \
--cc=eva@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox