From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45506-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QFjHT-0005dQ-Te
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:42:33 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45B431C07E;
	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:42:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97351C02B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:41:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so1659584gwj.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=agVk9nD/mcD3FTiY4I5e86ZAK3TgplIMDpOak2AXDKE=;
        b=QzizigOpS8E0FEcoDquVk3SUwuzdZ8k2lk9vcWuoWpCFjAdqT2tKAJRO0uKOWftSgS
         BN9rGSnnU8hcWm0C7fr6ArjHJ4QPbFOr3fWHkG5HpmFqA4Ki11wj/ozsV0i42nK//PHn
         5cnQ5Y0Xfbv91xdxhZV1KbJVlashz0A05ntOE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ek6IdZ2OqTJcwt3sEzVi1ekb+9Tnc55FGUcw1MzbeBgxUy0L4Ljy3vJaVea/2fmQm4
         6AWEbMnPl5eyc+6I7j3DSSSniQXahDnNBAC62dKGVgnS7zTK87M5qMIrprRd3tUXtCMt
         d266TlP6GhSeOjNJaE+UYj4o8KtYZEqFmJ8LA=
Received: by 10.150.171.8 with SMTP id t8mr4447809ybe.234.1304066500332;
        Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-116-34.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.116.34])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z2sm2597319anj.37.2011.04.29.01.41.38
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DBA79C1.5050903@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:41:37 -0500
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18) Gecko/20110325 Gentoo/2.0.13 SeaMonkey/2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate
References: <20110412145622.GA26275@linux1> <20110429072248.GB27531@linux1>
In-Reply-To: <20110429072248.GB27531@linux1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 6a97df18deec8d03e0278842fdc80157

William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> The openrc stable candidate is now openrc-0.8.2-r1.
>
> The changes between it and the previous stable candidates are small, so
> the news item date and stable request date are still 2011/05/01 and 2011/05/08
> respectively.
>
> The more important part of this test is that we need some users to
> migrate from baselayout-1 to openrc-0.8.2-r1 and be sure that is
> successful.
>
> As usual, let me know if there are any issues.
>
> William
>
>    

I'm willing to test.  Is it as simple the news item says?  If there is a 
problem, can I simply go back to baselayout 1?

I'm amd64 by the way.  I also have a older x86 machine if that would 
help any.

Let me know.

Dale

:-)  :-)