From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QFjHT-0005dQ-Te for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:42:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45B431C07E; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97351C02B for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so1659584gwj.40 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:41:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=agVk9nD/mcD3FTiY4I5e86ZAK3TgplIMDpOak2AXDKE=; b=QzizigOpS8E0FEcoDquVk3SUwuzdZ8k2lk9vcWuoWpCFjAdqT2tKAJRO0uKOWftSgS BN9rGSnnU8hcWm0C7fr6ArjHJ4QPbFOr3fWHkG5HpmFqA4Ki11wj/ozsV0i42nK//PHn 5cnQ5Y0Xfbv91xdxhZV1KbJVlashz0A05ntOE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ek6IdZ2OqTJcwt3sEzVi1ekb+9Tnc55FGUcw1MzbeBgxUy0L4Ljy3vJaVea/2fmQm4 6AWEbMnPl5eyc+6I7j3DSSSniQXahDnNBAC62dKGVgnS7zTK87M5qMIrprRd3tUXtCMt d266TlP6GhSeOjNJaE+UYj4o8KtYZEqFmJ8LA= Received: by 10.150.171.8 with SMTP id t8mr4447809ybe.234.1304066500332; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-116-34.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.116.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z2sm2597319anj.37.2011.04.29.01.41.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DBA79C1.5050903@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:41:37 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18) Gecko/20110325 Gentoo/2.0.13 SeaMonkey/2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate References: <20110412145622.GA26275@linux1> <20110429072248.GB27531@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20110429072248.GB27531@linux1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6a97df18deec8d03e0278842fdc80157 William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > The openrc stable candidate is now openrc-0.8.2-r1. > > The changes between it and the previous stable candidates are small, so > the news item date and stable request date are still 2011/05/01 and 2011/05/08 > respectively. > > The more important part of this test is that we need some users to > migrate from baselayout-1 to openrc-0.8.2-r1 and be sure that is > successful. > > As usual, let me know if there are any issues. > > William > > I'm willing to test. Is it as simple the news item says? If there is a problem, can I simply go back to baselayout 1? I'm amd64 by the way. I also have a older x86 machine if that would help any. Let me know. Dale :-) :-)