From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QFR7F-0005VY-0Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:18:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B702E041F; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1A31C01C for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.5.0.25] (unknown [192.80.55.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: c1pher) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6C881BC016 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DB9681F.1040203@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:14:07 -0400 From: Dane Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110427 Thunderbird/3.1.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Camellia? References: <20110427221424.GA19308@zptr-nb18> In-Reply-To: <20110427221424.GA19308@zptr-nb18> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: ad9c732e0b9719bec9462d576a073c00 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/27/2011 06:14 PM, Eray Aslan wrote: > openssl ciphers -v 'ALL:@STRENGTH' I find it somewhat hard to believe that they are using a version of OpenSSL that doesn't have AES-256. It's been around since 0.9.7. Having said that, I don't know of any major weakness with the cipher. The only thing I don't personally really love about it is the lack of analysis. Something like AES has been the majority of the fields notice and gets more attention, so it is likely better analyzed and understood. Regards, - -- Dane Smith (c1pher) Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86 RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNuWgfAAoJEEsurZwMLhUx1c0P/RVO1g0Ph9zl6YmlLHwJVH/h RrAN/OdSQRoefGrSEuzKGQJtegmvNakzc4+YOxPsM8nXg2bBBokxkm2smr2H9YQ1 07Gf6kgLw7ZmPzy5sVPDaqd3Y6P9PQa9rvwwejX4XvQZAtFRC/jljPk1qLUutxte vCdlHQUl2cpV01qzFDtm+YRThPqTSA91Ecrq3yaqZn9mtPmcKjS5uz4eUPSJrepm xDnXUeCstgEADcjgVA2ofshpdrBLKNcePQQ/FDOuGXkGeQM70CO+U4Yekhe7fvF6 tEK7QomLxPOvTz2OZsSQErmXhysfHHBEM/uo1Mxnk4zkGZzBpexGsEhkPESsTkVR k8wiwQvLacr+NslDNRAa1c08HU+j6JcvjTbcq8shMD8PvsmS+I3TbUEZsVOBGe6E kMxG+zwWD3LmXSZCvrUtQeBN+aLpRpa5cibGIgYZtoYe9miT2LW3D1UmvzYNvlZA 0QW0zEOrxrBgHdxBBOgZLN+hCZUaMoAfi0m7AMqFczmyulXsER/ROFsCZmLhzKPK yK9Y3kAAU7Y0aOjVhwqU4JKuyPvho0SntpRZGSCIXPMncySb163CkeecJ1to8+1O IN5rY4O9jFMWDHNFz7NMSD6Hnk4zoem6b/+v6qYoT6uHx3sYT/C7l3E0OJ2B7SI/ tXeYUYa/mR49AszHpaes =lpeo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----