From: Dane Smith <c1pher@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Camellia?
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:14:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB9681F.1040203@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110427221424.GA19308@zptr-nb18>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/2011 06:14 PM, Eray Aslan wrote:
> openssl ciphers -v 'ALL:@STRENGTH'
I find it somewhat hard to believe that they are using a version of
OpenSSL that doesn't have AES-256. It's been around since 0.9.7.
Having said that, I don't know of any major weakness with the cipher.
The only thing I don't personally really love about it is the lack of
analysis. Something like AES has been the majority of the fields notice
and gets more attention, so it is likely better analyzed and understood.
Regards,
- --
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=lpeo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 19:38 [gentoo-dev] Camellia? James Cloos
2011-04-27 22:14 ` Eray Aslan
2011-04-28 13:14 ` Dane Smith [this message]
2011-04-28 15:35 ` Eray Aslan
2011-04-28 15:59 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
2011-04-28 18:30 ` James Cloos
2011-04-28 14:35 ` Dane Smith
2011-04-28 19:06 ` Eray Aslan
2011-04-28 20:03 ` Mark Loeser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB9681F.1040203@gentoo.org \
--to=c1pher@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox