From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QDcaU-0002Eh-I2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:09:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 786881C031; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4384E0509 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (hnvr-4d07906c.pool.mediaWays.net [77.7.144.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chithanh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1826B1B4017 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DB2CF26.80500@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:07:50 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2jDrS1UaGFuaCBDaHJpc3RvcGhlciBOZ3V54buFbg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18) Gecko/20110403 Gentoo/2.0.13 SeaMonkey/2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? References: <4DB26C3C.8090602@gentoo.org> <20110423110343.GA17456@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20110423110343.GA17456@linux1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 31f5d642a60a47ed905e3043cfae163c William Hubbs schrieb: > I'm not an overlay user, but I'm thinking that an overlay user might be > able to get around this by putting the virtual in package.provided. > Why must the user do it? Can't the package manager do it? Regards, Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen