From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QBjxA-0004LO-TP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:37:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B0661C09A; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864101C081 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.128.0.8] (unknown [79.170.210.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hkbst) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C2641B404D for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DABF893.8050301@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:38:43 +0200 From: Marijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110308 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate References: <20110412145622.GA26275@linux1> <20110416160519.GA7881@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20110416160519.GA7881@linux1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8a7cb0ab86ea6fb33a26d61b08512d7a -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/16/11 18:05, William Hubbs wrote: > ll, > > there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate. > > I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very > small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization date from my > original announcement. > > - news item release on 5/1 > - stabilization on 5/8. Please, to avoid confusion, use month names instead of numbers or include the year so people don't have to deduce the ordering. Marijn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2r+JMACgkQp/VmCx0OL2xiMgCgwiQx4qJzTGD8t+KM68SQMR/K NHYAoIglWa95Y+de1ZPs8LZn9BKtRrgc =0qDA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----