public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] Make usage and warnings
@ 2011-04-14  7:48 Tomá? Chvátal
  2011-04-14 12:37 ` Dane Smith
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tomá? Chvátal @ 2011-04-14  7:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 712 bytes --]

Hi guys,
currently in main tree we have quite few places where direct make calls are 
used instead of emake.

Most of these are just poor excuses to avoid setting -j1 bit later. This 
soultion is problematic because users can set more make options and they all 
get ignored this way.

I would like to propose repoman warning that would report direct make usage 
and possibly fill the bugs where relevant so it gets migrated to "emake -j1" 
(or whatever else is required).

Cheers
-- 
Tomáš Chvátal
Gentoo Linux Developer [Cluster/Council/KDE/QA/Sci/X11]
E-Mail          : scarabeus@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP        : 94A4 5CCD 85D3 DE24 FE99 F924 1C1E 9CDE 0341 4587
GnuPG ID        : 03414587


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Make usage and warnings
  2011-04-14  7:48 [gentoo-dev] Make usage and warnings Tomá? Chvátal
@ 2011-04-14 12:37 ` Dane Smith
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dane Smith @ 2011-04-14 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/14/2011 03:48 AM, Tomá? Chvátal wrote:
> Hi guys,
> currently in main tree we have quite few places where direct make calls are 
> used instead of emake.
> 
> Most of these are just poor excuses to avoid setting -j1 bit later. This 
> soultion is problematic because users can set more make options and they all 
> get ignored this way.
> 
> I would like to propose repoman warning that would report direct make usage 
> and possibly fill the bugs where relevant so it gets migrated to "emake -j1" 
> (or whatever else is required).
> 
> Cheers

+1

I also am a big proponent of *not* using -j1 unless it is 100%
necessary. Fix the Makefile. Don't just take the shortcut. There is a
tracker for that here [1].

[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351559

Regards,
- -- 
Dane Smith (c1pher)
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=ZrdI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-14 12:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-14  7:48 [gentoo-dev] Make usage and warnings Tomá? Chvátal
2011-04-14 12:37 ` Dane Smith

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox