From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4YTu-0002gH-4i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:57:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E2971C08B; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A18A1C071 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [83.146.207.236] (dyn-207-236-dsl.vsp.fi [83.146.207.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 558E71B403F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4D91D711.4000106@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:56:49 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110322 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: New global USE flag called "ios", not same as "ipod" ? References: <4D915098.2090609@gentoo.org> <20110329144655.32a4829d@laverne> In-Reply-To: <20110329144655.32a4829d@laverne> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 21b3614cbb8e1463f12f7e88ff0d4c0e On 03/29/2011 03:46 PM, Hanno B=F6ck wrote: > Am Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:23:04 +0300 > schrieb Samuli Suominen : >=20 >> The magic number is often 5, this is 4 but it's only magic! >=20 > When I hear "ios" I first think of Cisco's IOS rather than Apple's. Is > this an issue? >=20 Yeah, good point. But I still don't think it's an issue. And I hope so too, because I've just committed that use.desc change like 5 mins ago ;-) - Samuli