* [gentoo-dev] RFC: Ideas on the remaining imlib-1 consumers?
@ 2011-03-28 20:02 Samuli Suominen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Samuli Suominen @ 2011-03-28 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
It would be nice to finally get rid of old imlib. Does anyone have
suggestions on the remaining consumers?
Patches, new versions, replacements, ...
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/misc/rindex/media-libs/imlib
app-misc/endeavour
app-office/magicpoint (optional)
media-gfx/gimageview (optional, works fine without imlib. tested.)
media-gfx/kuickshow (new package using old imlib, perhaps to avoid GTK+
as a KDE package? weird case.)
media-libs/fnlib
media-video/motioneye (sort of optional)
www-client/w3mmee (optional)
x11-misc/bbacpi (unrelated: is propably broken anyway with sysfs)
x11-misc/wmakerconf (optional)
x11-misc/xdock (not important...)
x11-misc/xteddy (not important...)
x11-plugins/gkrellmoon (oh noes! must save.)
x11-terms/mlterm (optional)
x11-wm/icewm (optional)
And don't worry... I won't be forcing anything because of imlib... This
is just a friendly query...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-03-28 20:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-28 20:02 [gentoo-dev] RFC: Ideas on the remaining imlib-1 consumers? Samuli Suominen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox