From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2tFX-00023R-Kp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:43:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2E111C0D6; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67761C02C for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [78.192.105.75]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB3094012E for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:42:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D8BC8E4.1080104@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:42:44 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Cardona?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 11a73742794b2d52f804544f9ec76f1c Le 24/03/2011 22:59, Mike Frysinger a =E9crit : > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned > Manifest's anymore ? generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is > ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have > done this already. I, for one, have never signed my Manifests because I've always found GnuPG to be a major PITA. With that being said, I do understand the rationale of signing them and I'll adapt. However, is there a howto or something explaining how to work _efficiently_ with GPG? How do I avoid having to type my pass-phrase for every commit? Cheers, R=E9mi PS, wasn't manifest-signing supposed to become moot once we moved to git?