From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2smd-0007SW-S0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:13:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E52C41C0D1; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD8D1C004 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.199] (qiv7.kyla.fi [82.130.46.199]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EC922BAA0 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4D8BC1CC.2070804@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:12:28 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig926CBC600445F84D15F21B77" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e54f49c5cdb78c7e1d09a9bd66ce8819 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig926CBC600445F84D15F21B77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/24/2011 11:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned > Manifest's anymore ? generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is > ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have > done this already. >=20 Also submitting the quizzes require you to have a GPG key. This probably hasn't been a priority before all the tree can be signed. I think it would be idea to start preparing for that by requiring people sign as you said. Regards, Petteri --------------enig926CBC600445F84D15F21B77 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNi8HMAAoJEPeUsk245OzwtkcQAJouvXnuHODJVcSxOFB+FdRy OJ0cqCwUwKpMIJKce+A9GCOmI6qQDiTALJQPz1vl/qyrwk0qtoFMaBs/cSSC9qsC q/5wWtm3lGSrs6j2UiLMvt+RcpfoX2vdKujKMdQYFDyEXaiseR1O8wY0XP/upJAW eQYsLDCU+3ZSL3Szy2mYyFYEIekjBHlaG+FH+I/D+et0GY1pUI6vxfa97KIlxRkN ybayfGjNS0Y0UQ8s0jZH9Lv64nqHn/milTV91gpRzjzhCZjvf4jXhjhCp/7hXYrU MUcf00B5L8O+A+nQauphfdXSQ1T8x07SHg+vN0VVUVGvGVq60xu/nCgV7iYzN3Tz h7bmUon1WiAAjGUBFU5UqqNLExHMAUrQ+HADX+26wqxLlLC4nctELEwIKV9muyYi u0v9s2cyTCGu4aVgz1adzMndLwZtR08wufKLH/F2tIz+tPdx8vwxXjDQpKczf30B 1dt8JhwzMSwCDuQhUZ/832QbWdaWYHf6HzSXdoeu5NzJtlze6LwqBegf1psktUJr HM516r1bWUpbjdvvgNbah7gUI6lk34+PY0yedloWL2DHaXfSQMsY4KEUebF0wUM7 fpQINnfMgxmF3dd8vtPP2R2hw0Q2viaoINdjHgpUVW5SpPxSRapDvZwEZfn/NSGW jDoOShhT/ZLVnuBzmepU =b8Ac -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig926CBC600445F84D15F21B77--