From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1dud-0007GN-4v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:08:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E36F1C059; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057CF1C02D for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.20.5.240] (fw-gw-atm.mimuw.edu.pl [193.0.96.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28E5B1B4105 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4D873F85.5070203@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:07:33 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1DF0C4ABA3A096A406E81096" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 69e5a054e1d591d82131ba615c3df2a6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1DF0C4ABA3A096A406E81096 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable sys-devel/gcc runs tests, but the results are ignored and I remember the tests fail most of the time. Because the tests take long time to run and fail anyway (I understand it's non-trivial to fix those on Gentoo side), I wonder whether it makes sense to run them at all: toolchain.eclass: gcc_src_test() { cd "${WORKDIR}"/build emake -j1 -k check || ewarn "check failed and that sucks :(" } My suggestion is to make the src_test empty (I think the default one still calls make). I can produce a patch if needed. What do you think? --------------enig1DF0C4ABA3A096A406E81096 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk2HP4UACgkQuUQtlDBCeQLKpwCdEKdiBZr6lB2/wsqB56ly2t6N zsUAnjTWF2Lzf825sOR9kiQCv9+IOhpL =O4oP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1DF0C4ABA3A096A406E81096--