From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PxccI-0005me-TZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:57:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B81CE06B5; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A907E06AF for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paul.ibi.kfa-juelich.de (ibi109.ibi.kfa-juelich.de [134.94.85.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jlec) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15BFD1BC031; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4D78A04F.3070206@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:56:31 +0100 From: justin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making largefile a global use References: <4D7886F8.2030507@gentoo.org> <1299750299.2212.57.camel@raven.home.flameeyes.eu> In-Reply-To: <1299750299.2212.57.camel@raven.home.flameeyes.eu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig85789622B6CAF77C84F5B82C" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4d1a1076b4da9db4da89c40528724ca4 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig85789622B6CAF77C84F5B82C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/03/11 10:44, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > Il giorno gio, 10/03/2011 alle 09.08 +0100, justin ha scritto: >> >> there are not many packages using it, but I will add this flag to >> another 10.=20 >=20 > Why? just because upstream has this configure flag. but it seems we agree on removing the flag completely, defaulting on largefile support and fixing what needs a fix. Correct? justin --------------enig85789622B6CAF77C84F5B82C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk14oE8ACgkQgAnW8HDreRZYmACfY+NsJZpr5haPM2/U9Pd05vU1 TLoAn2sqTtbtyp11ay3MyTNEqvK50d6W =ThcH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig85789622B6CAF77C84F5B82C--