From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ptj6w-0003EK-Pu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:04:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 699711C0A6 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE4F1C047 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (ip-94-112-147-25.net.upcbroadband.cz [94.112.147.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: scarabeus) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D65A21B40DB for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4D6A6F2B.8030504@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:35:07 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSBDaHbDoXRhbA==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110116 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] unbreaking net-print/foo2zjs References: <4D6A633D.5050100@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4D6A633D.5050100@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 38b00e6176aa4282c63393c23c5a6bfa -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dne 27.2.2011 15:44, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." napsal(a): > Currently foo2zjs is completely broken because of digest verification > issues. I happen to have a printer that requires foo2zjs, and I decided > to fix this problem. >=20 > I've submitted a live ebuild, see >=20 > It's not ideal, but it works for me, and can be a starting point for > creating fully versioned tarballs on Gentoo side. >=20 > As the package seems rather unmaintained, I'm going to wait for a while > and check in the ebuild if nobody is against that. >=20 > Any feedback is welcome, please let me know what you think. >=20 > Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr. >=20 Given the fact i am last touching it i would say do whatever you want. On the side note... upstream is insane and i am quite happy that foo2zjs requiring printer died on me :)) For the same note i hate that wgeting cause it ain't signed at all, so you can't trust what the fck are you fetching. Also those patches that were on current release had meaning, so unless they were fixed by upstream you should apply them. Cheers Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1qbysACgkQHB6c3gNBRYcvhwCdHZRuDLS78NfqNUCHdn7Sy7kq HpQAoLYbEWVEfCCvxUqGB7E8ip6WcbHs =3D5fgu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----