From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PkKPN-0007Zg-4B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:52:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7649CE09CD; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1820AE092B for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [83.146.207.236] (dyn-207-236-dsl.vsp.fi [83.146.207.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2699E1B41F2 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4D4848C0.2090309@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:54:08 +0200 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110110 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs References: <1296581757.8163.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1296581757.8163.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b4326ca52a00ec79afd217f4b54b47bb On 02/01/2011 07:35 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Hello > > As you probably know, dotnet team is really small (for now, only > Alistair and me are taking care) and some of packages maintained by > dotnet team are a headache to maintain. > > For now I would like to drop dev-dotnet/edtftpnet maintainership > > The reasons for this are: > 1. It's only keyworded on x86 and I mainly use amd64, then, I have never > used it. > 2. Version is tree is really old, but I haven't tried to bump it since I > don't know how to test it works ok. > 3. It was added years ago by Jurek and I don't know if any of you uses > it :-/ > > Feel free to take it if you wantand, if you want to take any other > "dotnet" package, please contact us ;-) > > > Or even better, if you want to join dotnet... it would be really > appreciated :-D > > Thanks a lot Consider also lastriting those dotnet packages that are outdated and doesn't get a maintainer (from these mails). Ones that you think are not up to speed ebuild (or package) wise. It's still better to have nothing, than have crap... ;-) - Samuli