From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OzumH-00079J-6x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:12:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80B4BE0AB8; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:12:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16227E0AA0 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.198] (qiv6.kyla.fi [82.130.46.198]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B88E341F5 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C9F7F70.9020902@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:14:24 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Why (i.e. USE="openssl" instead of USE="ssl") References: <1281785177.6299.58.camel@lillen> <4C6688B1.7070608@gentoo.org> <1281803388.6299.71.camel@lillen> <1281960456.28395.78.camel@tablet> <1281975091.9457.2.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE5A0CF3F30B5BF9ED6F1849B" X-Archives-Salt: 5e679530-4580-4c42-a836-a64fc54cb4d5 X-Archives-Hash: 7310d6b1c135aabde8ec09a1dc82ff01 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE5A0CF3F30B5BF9ED6F1849B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/16/2010 08:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: >> Le lundi 16 ao=C3=BBt 2010 =C3=A0 16:07 +0400, Peter Volkov a =C3=A9cr= it : >>> This was discussed many times here and since every time we had same >>> consensus the policy is in place. It's just not written in devmanual >>> or >>> gentoo.org/doc. >> >> Preceeding didn't seem to make it through (yet), so here it goes: >> please write that down. A policy that is not written down is not >> something you can expect people to know and follow, even if it seems >> "falls under common sense" from your or QA's point of view. >=20 > true, but that doesnt mean the current situation cannot be fixed > -mike >=20 There's an open repoman bug about this: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D311629 Patches welcome, Petteri --------------enigE5A0CF3F30B5BF9ED6F1849B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMn39xAAoJEPeUsk245OzwhmAQAIknG2I61jwWp6JmzX2nDsqy tu/mLS2TM0JbljwBbIRMFBJ2CbDf/8OE+nE6ggGp1nu0S0SXcB+KOgSFQfImQr/3 +myZyAE62hg90HQGrUGtLHY3wjthMLCKT34QA+T1uSuUvLOafQYsSiBFMm5Rs2r8 e4fxDBVmC0xXvgvJS+t5uGwlxi5UaMQBc9HrAHyODMn37W+pf3GXhj7GSzWILqdb 4/tB+poCVUJfimlAEe6bWBQdHjQnAubldV7p8itRhiSUGn7kI7p4LgiDZV4d3uke IAIhRdxau9JjjN2fCAl3pSgwRcAXbpgyRzFDGnZbCDHWnQUXawPfB+EeRpKjp48x i5f6Q5bvDoOYv7J/tdrHkBkDCGrrmeSzL6x+RpeMgWXV1WP4uHmkJFwshpWHf5fX e4gVcPHzMudUgxIO3dTyp59AM/YGuYUbmvx6QujhRJn6S+oUpsNy4GBm2Cc9CQcp XLgfZINf6A1I1UP2qrkWqEtCSRV2a+CLA+Z4BVRKcSflSs6HdePmtq2SyzRvF12N 6otqpOE8PVjqabTrQJ6Ru7eiz/46zLBlThaOxNw8IpCptWQ9LGw/PJXyZz7nZgys XfiBkvfh6/nYZHBrds25VhAO/NcnP61cI4vmQ11+KEYMQRDaEikkRStMLncYH7wY 0S06x1OaNkYwmyBYJfF1 =4F2y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE5A0CF3F30B5BF9ED6F1849B--