From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Oofqs-00008S-DT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:02:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CE64E1096; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net (vms173001pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9278DE0F75 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.thefreemanclan.net ([unknown] [96.245.231.248]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L7R009A0RBTRWQ0@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:02:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (rich.homedns.org [192.168.0.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gw.thefreemanclan.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14ED9175A4C1 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:02:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-id: <4C769E17.2000307@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:02:15 -0400 From: Richard Freeman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100727 Thunderbird/3.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo References: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> <4C7494BA.4040104@gentoo.org> <4C7546CE.3050002@gentoo.org> <201008251506.05605.vapier@gentoo.org> <4C757A1D.1000901@gentoo.org> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: cd93ce78-67ad-428e-bb96-36d3b2ed0f69 X-Archives-Hash: fcceefeca68af171126d237ac4c09778 On 08/25/2010 08:29 PM, Duncan wrote: > But that was pretty much decided some time ago, based on my following of > the relevant discussions here and elsewhere, so why are you arguing a > point that's not being argued any more? I believe that's what Mike's > WTFing about. It's not that you're wrong, you're not, it's that you're > debating a question that's no longer being asked. > See: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/67098 and http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/67098 The post I replied to cited upstream issues as a reason not to adopt OpenRC. My point is that upstream issues are not a distinguishing factor between OpenRC and baselayout-1. It isn't like I'm re-opening a thread from months ago. I'm replying directly to a point others have raised. If there is no debate about whether OpenRC should be adopting it, then why is it even being discussed in this way? Let's just do it... Rich